A collection of historic homes for those who dream...

1752 in Canterbury, CT

10/6/26 4 Comments
Details on OHD may be outdated. Verify using the link references below.
As of 10/6/26, this home was for sale.
$399,600

11 N Canterbury Rd, Canterbury, CT 06331

Charming 1752 quintessential center chimney Colonial on nearly 2 acres of pretty landscape. Lovingly maintained for over 40 years this captivating classic features original period details highlighting 5 working fireplaces wow, functional beehive oven, original buttery, wonderful chestnut and pine wide board floors and 2 staircases. Spacious eat-in-kitchen with updated stainless appliances, Corian counterops and farmhouse sink sit by the firplace and enjoy! The kitchen opens to a keeping room where you can gather around the beehive oven and hearth. The main level continues with the formal dining room, pink parlor and den which leads to relaxing time in the screened in porch. The second floor boasts an elegant primary bedroom with fireplace and 2-3 additional versatile bedooms could also be used for an office, extra closet or playroom. Fabulous 2nd floor laundry room. Attic space surprises. 3 car garage. Shed/mancave. Numerous upgraded mechanicals including newer drilled well, oil tank and more. Canterbury is rich in local history and this home is a true gem!
3 Bed ∙ 2 Bath ∙ 2,700 Sq Ft ∙ 1.88 Ac.
State: | Region: | Period & Associated Styles: |
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Civility is expected. This site is devoted to historic architecture and the stories it carries, so please keep discussions within those walls. Comments are overseen by both readers and automated moderation. If you spot a remark that crosses the line, click the red flag in the upper right corner of the comment.

Political commentary of any kind is strictly forbidden.

By commenting, you are agreeing that you have read and will follow the comment policy.
[Click here to review the full comment policy.] Updated 7/21/26.

Old House Dreams does not represent this property. All listing details should be independently verified.